In an article on the New APPS blog, philosopher Dennis Des Chene reminds everyone of the risks of relying on second-hand media sources, especially when they dramatically oversimplify scientific results. Bad science reporting is a problem we've noted here on more than one occasion. Des Chene is right to say, "there is no substitute for reading the original studies." (And, we should add, still better than going back to the original study is repeating the experiment—for any study is ultimately based in someone's experience!)
Critical Thinking Web Exchange
< Back to the Critical Thinking Web Exchange Home
< Back to the Critical Thinking Web Exchange Home
Always go to the source
Michael Rooney - Saturday, September 10, 2011
- Trackback Link
- http://www.advancedreasoningforum.org/BlogRetrieve.aspx?BlogID=7792&PostID=297211&A=Trackback
- Trackbacks
- Post has no trackbacks.
Recent Posts
- But of course!
- The Sexless Seventeenth Century?
- Inconceivable!
- An example of reducing to the absurd
- Phenomenological fallaciousness
- Getting closer to experience
- Great scientists deny the antecedent too
- Don't believe everything you hear—especially from logic professors
- It's undeniably deniable
- Bogus Aristotle quotes

Comments